Urge Congress to START Tackling the Deficit with these $350 Billion in Cuts?

Urge Congress to Start Tackling the Deficit with these $350 Billion in Cuts?

http://www.capwiz.com/taxpayer/issues/alert/?alertid=22378526&type=CO

On  quick glance, this looks to be a very good read.  Please check it out and let me know what you think!

I highly agree that we need to be talking about a minimum of HUNDREDS of BILLIONS of dollars in cuts!  Especially when the national debt is something like 14.46 TRILLION last i heard.  350 billion out of 14,460 billion(14.46 Trillion) is less than a quarter of 1 percent cut but at least it’s better than the incomplete suggestions that have been offered so far!!

Insane in the membrane!

ACTION? Let’s write our legislators about it! Use their Contact forms @ http://senate.gov  AND  http://house.gov

No Comments

“Vote for the lesser of 2 evils”?!

Came across this personal story today:

When I was at Ricks College in 1972, President Harold B. Lee came to talk to us in October, just before that years election. he talked about many things, then he talked about the election, America, etc., and said this: “Before you vote study out the candidates and the issues and make a decision as to who you want to vote for. Then, get down on your knees and pray for a confirmation that your decision is the correct one.” I have done this many times and as I have walked to the polls, actually changed my mind because of inspiration on who I would vote for.

Consider also, if you vote for what is correct principle, is your vote ever wasted? I remember when I was at Ricks College, President of the Student Senate. I was able travel to Salt Lake to meet with Pres. Ezra Taft Benson. …

At this time, as we were talking, President Benson interrupted me and said this: “Mike, if you vote for the lesser of two evils you are still voting for evil and you will be judged for it. You should always vote for the best possible candidate, whether they have a chance of winning or not, and then, even if the worst possible candidate wins, the Lord will bless our country more because more people were willing to stand up for what is right.

(emphasis added; source: Mike Thompson – http://consciencecom.blogspot.com/2010_08_01_archive.html )

Very interesting! I’d like to verify the quote but it seems true. I hope it is.

Since the 2008 election I’ve tried not to vote for the “lesser of 2 evils”.

I hope more of us are willing to do that and I hope we really will be blessed for it i pray.

P.S. Makes me think too that I hope we get open primaries in Utah where there is only 1 primary election with candidates from ALL of the parties.  Then the top 2 from that go on to the November election, even if they’re both from the same party.

-Roger B.

No Comments

Planning Commission Meeting – May 11th

5:00pm @ 351 W. Center St. (city center)

Public Hearing:
ITEM 1* Provo City requests an ordinance text amendment to adopt architectural guidelines for new buildings, building additions, and exterior alterations to existing buildings on properties along South State Street between the intersection of 900 East and State Street and 1860 South. Spring Creek, Provost, Provost South Neighborhoods 11-0007OA

Background?

The Provo State Street Improvement Project is primarily focused on improving safety on south State St. between
900 South and 1860 South. Provo City and the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) are planning to
add or improve the parkstrip, curb and gutter along the east side of the street. Plans also include shoulder
widening and a 10’ multi-use path.

News article: Provo unveils improvement plans for State Street

 

No Comments

reminder – tonight’s Public Hearings – May 3rd

Hi, just a reminder about tonight’s public hearings that start at 7:00 PM.
That’s the usual city Council meeting at the city center at 351 W. Center St.

At the bottom of this e-mail is a list of them; there’s about a dozen.

These are the ones that I think will be the most interesting:

  • Whether or not to create a connector road extending 1350 E. northward to
    connect with Seven Peaks Blvd. (pages 95 through 111 with some interesting maps
    in there!)
  • Whether or not to add protections for the hillsides(benches) in the SE part
    of town in the Provost and South Provost neighborhoods. (pages 81 – 87)
  • Whether or not to amend the campaign finance disclosure laws for city
    elections and whether to increase the candidate filing fee to $75 (pages 33 -
    36)
  • There are also various budget items for you financial watchhawks!

For details — see the attached document from council staff and then scroll
to the page numbers listed above in ()’s

If you can’t make it, make sure to take the time to send your input/feedback to our council members:
http://provocitizens.net/take-action/provo-city-council/

Again, the short list of what’s happening tonight is below and the details are in the attachment.

Thanks,

Roger Brown
801-356-1032

~~~ Meeting Agenda ~~~
* A public hearing regarding a resolution appropriating $384,740
in various funds for expenses relating to the Convention Center Development fees
and applying to the fiscal year ending June 30, 2011 (11-079BA)

* A public hearing to consider a resolution changing the Provo City General Plan
land use designation of approximately 9.85 acres of real property located
generally at 589 North Lakeshore Drive from Residential to Agricultural.
(10-0002GPA)

* A public hearing to consider a resolution amending the
Provo City General Plan land use policies for the Southeast Area and the Provost
South Neighborhood for real property located generally along the mountainside
from 300 North to 1400 South. (10-0003GPA)

* A resolution tentatively
adopting a tentative budget for Provo City Corporation for the fiscal
year beginning July 1, 2011 and ending June 30, 2012 (11-092RO)

* A public hearing to consider a resolution amending the Provo City General Plan Map
8.1 Major and Local Streets Plan to remove a proposed collector road located
generally at Seven Peaks Boulevard between Center Street and 300 South.
(10-0001S)

* A public hearing to consider a resolution amending Section 1
(Introduction), Section 5 (Existing Conditions), and Section 6 Improvement
Progam) of the existing Transportation Master Plan for the City of Provo, Utah,
and amending the Provo City General Plan to include the Transportation Master
Plan as part of the Transportation Section of the General Plan
(11-0001GPA)

* A public hearing to consider a resolution amending
sanitation fees on the Provo City Consolidated Fee Schedule
(11-061CFS-CA)

* An ordinance adopting Provo City Code Section 2.05.015 -
Candidate Filing Fees, and amending Provo City Code Section 2.05.010 -
Definitions and Section 2.05.040 – Campaign Financing Disclosure Statements
(11-077OA)

* A resolution tentatively adopting a tentative budget for the
Redevelopment Agency of Provo City Corporation for the fiscal year beginning
July 1, 2011 and ending June 30, 2012 (11-090RDA- RO)

* A resolution appropriating $85,957 in the tax increment fund for contract payments and
applying to the fiscal year ending June 30, 2011(11-080RDA)

* A resolution tentatively adopting a tentative budget for the Provo City Storm
Water Special Service District for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2011 and
ending June 30, 2012 (11-093RO)
~~~ End of Agenda ~~~

Attached: council staff document with details

No Comments

Utah lawmakers making citizen initiatives harder?

Today’s editorial in the Deseret News is spot on!

***

Editorial: Utah bill makes citizen initiatives harder

Utah lawmakers weren’t kidding when they insisted on defining the state as a republic, and not a democracy.

To prove the point, they further eroded a popular piece of direct democracy. Thanks to SB165, which now awaits Gov. Gary Herbert’s signature, getting an initiative petition on the ballot will be even harder in the future, and Utah has never been a particularly easy state in that regard.

In a year when people focused on the really egregious assaults on accountable government — such as HB477, which makes virtually all government records secret — the initiative law got little notice. But it’s apparent that the recent petition to force tough new ethics rules on legislators, which came up short but was close enough to force a few new rules, hit home.

Sponsored by Sen. Curt Bramble, R-Provo, and Rep. Brad Daw, R-Orem, the bill indirectly increases the number of signatures an initiative would have to gather in order to pass muster. Currently, that number is 10 percent of the number of people who voted in the last governor’s race from at least 26 of the 29 state senate districts. The new rules would change that to 10 percent of those who voted in the presidential race. The difference in numbers is slight. In 2008, it amounted to about 12,000 more votes for president than governor. But Utah held a special election for governor in 2010, and that attracted almost 400,000 fewer voters than the presidential race in 2010. Lawmakers clearly didn’t want anyone taking advantage of a one-time opportunity for an easier path to the ballot.

But the assault on the ethics petitions lies in the part of SB165 that specifically outlaws electronic signatures on petitions, something supporters tried to use. Lump this with HB477, which makes all e-mail and texts by public officials secret, and you have ample evidence Utah lawmakers will have to be dragged screaming into the 21st century, where electronic communications dominate all aspects of life.

I’ve long had reservations about citizen initiatives. The nation’s founders clearly didn’t like them, and for good reason. Initiatives are, however, attractive mechanisms for forcing lawmakers to follow the will of the people.

While I’m all for making the requirements strict enough to keep the ballot from looking like a California-style mess, initiatives can be especially important for accountability in a state dominated by one political party. Even before this year, Utah’s requirements were so strict as to make a petition drive nearly impossible for all but professional campaigns run by well-heeled out-of-state interest groups.

I’m also fairly certain most members of the tea party would favor giving greater power to the people.

But then, the anger that swept the nation with that movement last year seemed to take on a different tone in Utah, which already was a conservative stronghold. Here it became a license to protect a particular brand of conservative ideology from all challengers, which translated, in this year’s legislative session, into efforts to protect the power of those who already had acquired it.

That meant making it harder for the people to uncover wrongdoing or to correct it through initiatives. And that, of course, is something quite the opposite from what many Americans would regard as conservative, small-government, people-empowering politics.

The legislative session that ended last week was a showcase for muscle-flexing hubris of the kind that naturally follows one-party dominance.

The results of last year’s Census are worth noting. Utah is now the third fastest growing state and is part of a huge population shift that is rapidly making the West the center of the nation’s population.

Couple this with the increase in the state’s Hispanic population and it’s clear that changes are coming. Outsiders bring their own ideas with them. The days of governing through ideology may be numbered.

Jay Evensen is a Deseret News editorial writer. E-mail him at even@desnews.com. For more content, visit his web site, www.jayevensen.com

source: http://www.deseretnews.com/article/700117098/Editorial-Utah-bill-makes-citizen-initiatives-harder.html
***

(emphasis added by me)

No Comments

Urge Governor Herbert to VETO HB 377 now!

Hi, if you haven’t been following local news this week, this is a MUST READ:

*** Senate passes bill blocking public access to many government records

 

This is outrageous!  Government should be more transparent, not less! This is serious, no hype.  The bill will seriously neuter GRAMA.


#1 — Email the governor NOW @ http://governor.utah.gov/goca/form_comment.html

AND call him @ 801-538-1000.  URGE HIM TO VETO IT!!!

 

Need further witnesses?

#2 — http://www.cityweekly.net/utah/blog-5226-gov-herbert-veto-the-legislatures-secrecy-grab-in-.html?utm_source=twitter

and

 

#3 — http://www.southvalleyjournal.com/pages/full_story/?id=5712&type=Articles&numitems=1&startitem=0&showimages=true&sections=news&journals=SVJ

People, we can not wait — we must contact him now before it’s too late.

, ,

3 Comments

specious arguments in Provo?

(hi, just a few quick thoughts in rough draft form)

specious — “apparently good or right though lacking real merit” (source: dictionary.com)

Example of a specious argument — both single homeowners and families are allowed 2 extra unrelated people. Therefore there is equality.

Truth — it ignores the core by distracting you with the 2 extras. The core is that a single person can not just all of a sudden get married. A family with adult children can work together to pay the mortgage on a house. They can easily have 4 or more related adults working together to pay the mortgage. Become single and then you’re limited to only 3 people(including yourself) to help you pay the mortgage. Why should marital status make a difference in who can live in your own property?

specious argument — families deserve extra protection therefore they should be allowed more rights.

truth — some people never get married or don’t get married for a long time — should their own property rights be taken away from them just because they’re not married yet? Because the current law punishes those that are not married!

(stay tuned for more specious arguments and how to melt them away with the facts, the whole picture. too many good people in our community are blinded by these types of incomplete and specious arguments. stay tuned too for quotes from leaders where they talk about respecting and treating singles as equals.)

No Comments

Joaquin Parking Permits to be repealed by Provo City Council?

Hi, it hasn’t been widely published, but we wanted to share the good news!

Say what?  Yes, at this coming March 1st Provo City Council meeting, there will be discussion on whether or not to repeal or repeal/replace the North Joaquin Parking Permits scheduled to go into effect on Sept. 1st of this year!

That is great news!

Come at 7:00pm to 351 W. Center St.!  Speak out at the beginning during the Public Comments section!

P.S. stay tuned…

No Comments

Council Meeting w/Public Hearings – Feb. 15th!

People of Provo, here’s a quick reminder about tonight’s City Council Meetings — the most important one is @ 7:00pm with some Public Hearings — here’s the abridged version:

  1. Public Comments – 3 minutes per person
  2. a resolution regarding adding a composting fee for South Utah Valley Special Waste District
  3. Public Hearing regarding a proposed budget transfer of $45,450 from Project #5906 (Street Light Efficiency) to Project #5905 (City Center Energy Audit and Upgrade) for the purpose of the City Center Energy Audit and Upgrade
  4. Public Hearing regarding a proposed budget transfer of $12,852 from the General Services Division of the General Fund to the Parks and Recreation Eldred Center Division of the General Fund for the purpose of critical roof repairs.
  5. a resolution amending engineering fees
  6. a resolution authorizing the Chief Executive Officer to execute a real estate purchase agreement for the property located at 192 South University Ave
  7. resolution authorizing a real estate purchase agreement between the Redevelopment Agency of Provo and Champion Safe Company, within the Mountain Vista Business Park
  8. Public Hearing on the draft “Project Area Plan for the Mountain Vista Community Development Project Area”
  9. Consideration and Adoption of Resolution Adopting the Project Area Plan for the Mountain Vista Community Development Project Area?

source/full agenda: http://www.utah.gov/pmn/sitemap/notice/58883.html

Hottest item of the night?  In my opinion, it’s not during the night but earlier in the day during their regular work session — see this:

“A discussion regarding a proposal to amend the zoning title to prohibit the conversion of one-family structures to multiple units in areas that permit multiple-family structures non-conversion ordinance”

What in the?!

If the quote is shortened to “a proposal to amend the zoning title to prohibit the conversion of one-family structures to multiple units in areas that permit multiple-family structures” — is that still true?

I don’t know but I will find out!

NOTE: click here to find the Supporting Documents for tonight’s meetings.

P.S. As always, email the Provo City Council your thoughts!

P.P.S. for new people, the location is 351 W. Center St. Provo!

GOOD NEWS — UPDATE – 2/16/2007:  (we missed a very important item on the Study Meeting yesterday!)

They discussed and approved a motion to reconsider the North Joaquin Parking Permit program!  This is HUGE!  Not only do they want to consider postponing the start date from Sept 1st. 2011 to Aug. 2012 — they want to replace it with something fair!!!  Awesome! :)

What does this mean?  Contact your city council members now to give them your input — they will have a Public Hearing on it on March 1st (the next council meeting)!

resolution regarding adding a composting fee

No Comments

Provo City has a list for the state legislature??? …

More on this later!

http://www.heraldextra.com/news/local/central/provo/article_59578c5b-ddc2-54d3-9dc8-6ceb671b09d3.html

For now, I’ll give a quick preview of one of the items — the trampling of property rights has got to go — yes the infamous (yet a step in the right direction) zoning amendments/new state laws from this past April!

See http://ij.org and tell your elected officials too before they get slapped hard by them!!!  I’d rather see our city government or state government fix the laws now instead of waiting till they get sued!!!

No Comments